You are here
Bloomberg columnist admits and contrives a rationale for dollar imperialism
4:20p ET Thursday, April 13, 2023
Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:
An opinion column by Tyler Cowen of Bloomberg News today offered an awfully contrived rationale for U.S. dollar imperialism and exploitation throughout the world. But Cowen's acknowledging that imperialism and exploitation was service enough.
In his column, "What De-Dollarization? The Dollar Rules the World" --
-- appended here, Cowen argues that it's actually good that Americans, inhabitants of supposedly the richest country, live at the expense of poorer countries.
... Dispatch continues below ...
... ADVERTISEMENT ...
Buy metals at GoldMoney and enjoy international storage
GoldMoney was established in 2001 by James and Geoff Turk and is safeguarding more than $1.7 billion in metals and currencies. Buy gold, silver, platinum, and palladium from GoldMoney over the Internet and store them in vaults in Canada, Hong Kong, Singapore, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom, taking advantage of GoldMoney's low storage rates, among the most competitive in the industry.
GoldMoney also offers delivery of 100-gram and 1-kilogram gold bars and 1-kilogram silver bars.
To learn more, please visit:
http://www.goldmoney.com/?gmrefcode=gata
He writes: "Think of 'a sound and focal dollar' as a good or service that the U.S. produces, just as China manufactures phones or Japan makes cars. When Americans trade dollars for foreign goods and services, that measures as a U.S. trade deficit, but it can also be seen as America exporting dollars and 'dollar services.' The U.S. brands and markets its dollar, just as Zara or the Gap brands and markets clothing.
"So the much-vaunted U.S. trade deficit can be reconceptualized as a form of barter: One service (dollar stability) is being exchanged for another good or service (e.g., whatever America buys from China). In essence, branding and selling dollars so effectively -- also known as 'buying things' -- enables U.S. consumers to have a higher standard of living."
Forget for a moment that the dollar's "stability" has been a joke since dollar convertibility into gold was ended in 1971 and especially in the last several years, during which the primary export of the United States has been the inflation that is devastating the world.
Instead, consider whether the world could not devise an impartial currency that did not confer on a single country such an "exorbitant privilege," to use the long-ago term of a French finance minister -- the privilege to exploit the world economically to any extent.
Of course the world once had such an impartial currency -- gold.
Yes, to some extent the rest of the world may be getting what it deserves for its complicity with the longstanding U.S. policy of pushing gold outside the world financial system. But at least much of the rest of the world seems to be wising up to its enslavement and reawakening to the old virtues of the monetary metal.
Cowen may be right that the resentment felt by the rest of the world, no matter how justified, will never manage to overthrow the dollar. Even so, he inadvertently has acknowledged the justice of such a change.
CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
CPowell@GATA.org
* * *
Tyler Cowen: What De-Dollarization? The Dollar Rules the World
Dollar hegemony is beneficial for the U.S., its government and most of its citizens -- and is likely to last for the foreseeable future.
By Tyler Cowen
Bloomberg News
Thursday, April 13, 2023
By one estimate, the dollar is a part of 88% of all international transactions. Some people fear this dominance cannot last, while others question whether it should: Doesn’t a stronger dollar hurt US exports, and thus US workers?
The good news, for Americans at least, is that dollar hegemony is beneficial for the US, its government and most of its citizens. Furthermore, it is likely to last for the foreseeable future.
The issue has become more topical lately. Because of sanctions, Russia is cut off from many dollar-based networks. Other nations, such as Brazil, India and Saudi Arabia, have made at least cosmetic moves toward “de-dollarization,” hoping to rely less on the dollar for their international exchanges.
Think of “a sound and focal dollar” as a good or service that the US produces, just as China manufactures phones or Japan makes cars. When Americans trade dollars for foreign goods and services, that measures as a US trade deficit, but it can also be seen as America exporting dollars and “dollar services.” The US brands and markets its dollar, just as Zara or the Gap brands and markets clothing.
So the much-vaunted US trade deficit can be reconceptualized as a form of barter: One service (dollar stability) is being exchanged for another good or service (e.g., whatever America buys from China). In essence, branding and selling dollars so effectively — also known as “buying things” — enables US consumers to have a higher standard of living.
To be clear, sometimes selling a particular good or service can be a negative, or at least a mixed blessing. Venezuela’s economy is very dependent on oil revenue, for example, and with unstable oil prices, its revenues are unreliable. Demand for US dollars is not unstable in the same manner. In fact, with conflict in Ukraine and increasing Chinese ambitions, the dollar seems to have a secure future as a safe haven currency — maybe too secure, from a broader point of view.
If there is any danger here, it is that the forthcoming debate in Washington over the debt ceiling somehow results in a US default. Even if that were to happen, however, it would not be an argument against dollar hegemony, nor evidence that dollar hegemony must end. It would just be more proof of the stupidity of America’s politics.
To the extent the U.S. dollar is strong, that does make it harder for America to export other goods and services. But there is nothing special or undesirable about this reality. If South Korea were to export more Samsung phones, for instance, that would boost South Korean wages and the won, and in turn make it harder for Korea to export alternatives such as K-pop.
In any given country, different economic activities have to compete for resources, funding and attention. That’s simply an illustration of the basic economic fact of scarcity. If US dollars are so much in demand, it is testament to America’s history as a beacon of relative stability — which may be a stronger draw than, say, the quality of US tractors or movies.
How far is the talk of de-dollarization going to proceed? Probably not very. The US has the world’s deepest and most liquid financial markets, and they remain relatively open, in spite of some restrictions on Chinese investment in industries sensitive for national security. There are strong reasons to have a dominant currency in international markets, just as there are strong reasons for having a dominant currency in domestic transactions within the US. Liquidity for a currency begets further liquidity, whether at home or globally.
With the dollar estimated at 88% of all international transactions, the euro at 31% is only a modest competitor (since a transaction may involve two currencies, the total may exceed 100%). The euro, unlike the dollar, will never be tied to a single national government, and the European Union does not come close to the military might of the US.
The yuan is estimated at only 7% of that total of international transactions, and China seems unwilling to open up its capital markets, as that could lead to rapid capital outflows and possibly a financial crisis. But without open capital markets, the yuan is not a strong contender for a global reserve currency.
Economics can sometimes be complicated or hard to explain. When it comes the US dollar, it is neither. The dollar will retain its focal role, which is good for the US, and the reasons are simple and intuitive.
* * *
Toast to a free gold market
with great GATA-label wine
Wine carrying the label of the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee, cases of which were awarded to three lucky donors in GATA's recent fundraising campaign, are now available for purchase by the case from Fay J Winery LLC in Texarkana, Texas. Each case has 12 bottles and the cost is $240, which includes shipping via Federal Express.
Here's what the bottles look like:
http://www.gata.org/files/GATA-4-wine-bottles.jpg
Buyers can compose their case by choosing as many as four varietals from the list here:
http://www.gata.org/files/FayJWineryVarietals.jpg
GATA will receive a commission on each case of GATA-label wine sold. So if you like wine and buy it anyway, why not buy it in a way that supports our work to achieve free and transparent markets in the monetary metals?
To order a case of GATA-label wine, please e-mail Fay J Winery at bagman1236@aol.com.
* * *
Support GATA by purchasing
Stuart Englert's "Rigged"
"Rigged" is a concise explanation of government's currency market rigging policy and extensively credits GATA's work exposing it. Ten percent of sales proceeds are contributed to GATA. Buy a copy for $14.99 through Amazon --
-- or for an additional $3 and a penny buy an autographed copy from Englert himself by contacting him at srenglert@comcast.net.
* * *
Help keep GATA going:
GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:
To contribute to GATA, please visit:
