Barrick is innocent, MineWeb editor says

Lawsuit alleges Barrick plotted to undermine gold price;
'Ludicrous,' company says

Steve Maich
National Post, Canada
smaich@nationalpost.com
Thursday, December 19, 2002

a href=http://www.nationalpost.com/home/story.html?id=http://www.nationalpost.c...
8EC2-8EA289F89210

A large U.S. metals dealer is suing Canada's biggest gold
mining company and one of the largest banks in the United
States, alleging the two conspired to drive down the price
of gold and manipulate world financial markets for the past
15 years.

The lawsuit, filed by New Orleans-based metals dealer
Blanchard amp; Co. in Louisiana District Court, says Barrick
Gold Corp. and J.P. Morgan Chase hatched a scheme to
sink gold prices through a complex system of derivatives
trades and off-balance-sheet deals.

The suit claims that, if not for Barrick and J.P. Morgan's
intervention in the market, gold would now be worth close
to US$740 an ounce, more than double the US$343.25 it
closed at yesterday.

Barrick calls the suit quot;ludicrous.quot;

Barrick, controlled by multi-millionaire chairman Peter
Munk, promised yesterday to vigorously defend itself.

In its statement of claim, Blanchard said Barrick's alleged
actions have quot;pointedly reduced market interest in
Blanchard products and resulted in a significant loss of
business.quot;

It said the effects on its bottom line quot;continue to this day,quot;
saying in the claim that the alleged price-manipulation
caused many of its customers to stop buying gold.

None of Blanchard's allegations have been proven in court.

Vince Borg, a Barrick spokesman, said the company had not
received an official copy of the suit, but a press release
issued by Blanchard contained numerous inaccuracies and
defamatory statements. A J.P. Morgan spokesman said the
bank had not yet received copies of the suit and therefore
had no comment.

Several investors and analysts said the case may finally air
out one of the most enduring controversies in the public markets.

For years, investors and obscure mining newsletters have
accused Barrick and its partners of using complicated hedging
strategies to capitalize on, and even actively encourage, a
decline in the gold price.

Barrick has steadfastly denied these allegations, claiming
their derivative trades are intended to mitigate risk of falling
prices and do not unfairly sway the market.

Conspiracy theories, often propagated through Internet chat
rooms, have gone far beyond criticism of Barrick's hedging
strategy to allege some of the most powerful figures in the
world financial markets have conspired to depress the price
of gold to prop up the U.S. dollar and world stock markets.
Some conspiracy theorists have also cited Alan Greenspan,
chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, and other leading
central bankers as key players.

This lawsuit represents the first attempt by a large and
well-financed market player to force more disclosure about
what role major mining companies may have played in the
49 percent drop in the price of gold since 1987.

Gold was once an important asset class. But over the past
two decades, its appeal has waned. Many long-suffering gold
investors claim heavy selling by mining companies and banks
has unfairly hastened its fall and has cost investors untold
millions.

quot;There have been rumours for years around J.P. Morgan's
gold derivatives, and more recently there have been questions
raised about Barrick's off-balance-sheet items, and the
extreme complexity of their derivatives,quot; said Jean-Marie
Eveillard, who owns Barrick stock in the gold mutual fund
he manages for Socit Gnrale Asset Management Corp.
in New York. quot;In a sense, this lawsuit is an attempt to find
out if there is any truth to the rumours.quot;

Barrick confirmed yesterday it has made hedging profits of
about US$2-billion since the program was started in 1987,
allowing it to become one of the world's biggest gold miners.
But this year the price of gold has surged, and Barrick has
promised to reduce its hedging program by the end of 2003.

The threat of legal action has already hit Barrick's stock.
Yesterday, when the price of gold surged to a five-year high
and almost all other mining stocks were rising, Barrick's
shares fell 20 to $24.45.