'Journalists' don't bother to question original sources on gold, PPT

10:30a Wednesday, December 6, 2006

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

Today's Globe and Mail in Toronto has an article interviewing Sprott Asset Management's John Embry and touching on the gold price suppression scheme and the U.S. government's so-called "Plunge Protection Team." The article may be most notable for its dismissive quotation from Bloomberg News writer Caroline Baum. The article says:

"Critics of the price suppression theory dismiss the existence of a formal PPT. According to Caroline Baum of Bloomberg News, the alleged power of the PPT gains credibility with repetition. 'They swap the same fish tales back and forth with the stories acquiring respectability through frequent repetition among believers,' she wrote."

Baum purports to be a journalist but as far as anyone can tell she has never asked a central banker or U.S. Treasury Department official about, say, the ADMISSION of William R. White of the Bank for International Settlements, in a speech at a BIS meeting in 2005, that central banks actively supply gold to each other and the market "to influence asset prices," nor about the ADMISSION of Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke to Congress this year that the PPT does indeed exist.

As a journalist Baum might at least wonder why she isn't allowed to attend BIS, PPT, and G-7 meetings to see what really goes on there. Since Baum apparently doesn't wonder and doesn't even pick up the phone to ask, she has forfeited the right to be considered a journalist. Of course the Globe and Mail's reporter didn't make that effort either, and one has to wonder why he bothered quoting another supposed journalist who also can't be bothered to engage in journalism. But at least he allowed Embry to be quoted on the subject.

The Globe and Mail story is appended.

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.

* * *

Alleged 'Lunatic Fringe'
Sees $1,000 Gold

By Andrew Allentuck
The Globe and Mail, Toronto
Wednesday, December 6, 2006

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20061206.REMBRY06/TPSto...

Bug -- it's not a bad word among those who believe gold is the uber commodity of all times, and will soon soar to rule world markets. Confident that the yellow metal will shoot past its high, achieved in 1980 at $872 (U.S.) an ounce, gold bugs labour to explain why it has not already done so and when it will break the record.

John Embry, chief investment strategist for Sprott Asset Management Inc. in Toronto, is widely seen as the leading exponent of the theory that it is not markets but governments that are restraining the price of gold from rising to $1,000 or more. Currently, he heads the $650-million Sprott Gold and Precious Minerals Fund, which produced a 73.4-percent return for the 12 months ended Oct. 31. That was a first-quartile finish among the 18 funds in the field. However, Mr. Embry's real tour de force was in 2002, when he piloted the RBC Global Precious Metals Fund to a 153.1-percent gain, double the median return of peer gold funds in the period and the top return among all 3,299 portfolios in the Canadian mutual fund industry for that year. He is confident he could do it again.

"We have prospects of having a triple-digit return year within the next couple of years," Mr. Embry said. His record gives him a credibility that is the envy of other gold fund managers who moil through mining company annual reports. Yet there is a difference between the Embry approach to gold investing and what the also-rans do.

In the Embry view, gold should have and would have reached a price in the thousands of dollars per ounce were it not for a cabal of central banks who hold down the price of gold. As he explained in an October article he wrote for the Northern Miner, a trade paper, too much paper currency and commercial credit ultimately debase conventional money. Precious metals, mainly silver and gold, "will soar as investors come to realize the decline of fiat money," he predicted.

Gold, currently at $647.90, should hit $1,000 an ounce once barriers to its correct pricing are removed, Mr. Embry has argued. "Some investors believe the price of gold has been and continues to be artificially depressed," he wrote in a report, prepared with colleague Andrew Hepburn in 2004 entitled "Not Free, Not Fair: The Long-Term Manipulation of the Gold Price."

"As significant gold owners ourselves, we firmly side with the alleged lunatic fringe on this contentious topic."

A major rise in the price of gold is inevitable, Mr. Embry explained. But there will be costs. A leap in the price of gold would discredit central banks, create a flight from paper money to gold, destabilize world trade, and force the United States to pay its huge foreign trade bills with gold rather than cover its deficit with U.S. Treasury bonds that lose value against other major currencies. All that is keeping the price of gold from rising drastically is a so-called "Plunge Protection Team," or PPT, crafted by U.S. monetary authorities in 1989 to ensure world financial markets do not get too far out of line with the political needs of their masters, he noted.

Critics of the price suppression theory dismiss the existence of a formal PPT. According to Caroline Baum of Bloomberg News, the alleged power of the PPT gains credibility with repetition. "They swap the same fish tales back and forth with the stories acquiring respectability through frequent repetition among believers," she wrote.

For his part, Mr. Embry isn't budging. Gold stocks will thrive because the total being dug up and what central banks sell is falling behind demand for investment purposes. "The price of gold will head up over $1,000 when lack of physical supply held by central banks is insufficient to meet the mounting investment demand for gold," he said. "That should happen within the next six months. The gold price will swiftly head up over the 1980 high and go up to four figures," he added.

Among Mr. Embry's top bets:

Southwestern Resources Corp. is a Vancouver gold exploration firm that Mr. Embry bought at $3. The shares closed yesterday at $9.42. The firm has no cash flow but appears to have uncovered several million ounces of gold in China and has a promising site in Peru, he said.

Silver Standard Resources Inc. is a Vancouver silver miner that Mr. Embry bought at $20. The shares closed yesterday at $35.10. The firm is developing a deposit of 1.3 billion ounces of silver in Mexico. While the firm has no cash flow, shares should double, assuming silver, now at about $14, goes to $20, he said.

Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd. is a Toronto gold miner with mines in Wawa, Ont., and Val d'Or, Que. Shares purchased at $1.30 closed yesterday at $2.27. Wesdome should be able to break even, Mr. Embry said. If gold rises to $1,000 or more, the firm can earn its current share price in the next year or two, he added, and the stock could go to $10 if gold goes to four figures.

The price of gold should head up as central banks run out of bullion to sell, Mr. Embry said. "There is very little gold left in Fort Knox and not much in other coffers. The curtain has to come down soon on this chicanery."

* * *

Join GATA
at the
2007 Vancouver Resource Investment Conference
Vancouver Convention and Exhibition Centre
Sunday and Monday, January 21 and 22, 2007

http://www.cambridgeconferences.com/ch_jan2007.html

Admission is free for those who register in advance. The conference has arranged discount rates at the Pan Pacific Hotel adjacent to the convention center.

* * *

Help Keep GATA Going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at www.GATA.org. GATA is grateful for financial contributions, which are federally tax-deductible in the United States.